Great meeting everyone! This bi-monthly, all-day meeting schedule has been working wonders! I think we've accomplished more in the last few weeks because of this than any other thing.
Now, I have been a bit feverish lately, so let's see how well I do in recapping this last meeting-if you feel I have left out anything, simply add it to the post for consideration!
1.) SAM system (simple assignment management)
In general, it seems almost everyone is in support of the idea of offering a simple assignment system for non-registered members and casual contributors. This system would be tied to the FMS but on a different page, and would lack a lot of the options available to registered users. In essence, the casual member could access a simple list of tasks (quick tasks; make a shipping crate, or a security camera, for example) and use a submit form to upload them for review. Again, this is not a replacement for the FMS, rather a "simple" mode that does not require registration or knowledge of the FMS. This section would be heavily advertised through the getting started sections in order to help lure people in. There are a few downsides, of course, namely the fact that someone has to approve submissions, and a system to handle what is displayed on the simple page must be worked out. This could be as simple as I listed above, where anything in the FMS fitting a certain category (ie; simple) is all that is listed. This system would not list things like the Nia mesh, or massive sets that need far more care and dedication than simple props. The important thing here is fast, small, do-able tasks for the casual contributor.
2.) Seems like progress on both the storyboards and website fixes are on track! We divided up the remaining scenes and assigned them yesterday, which leaves us 2 weeks out from our official goal for completion of this phase. Check the assignment thread for more information. Once the boards are done, they will go through an extensive review and any changes before we either decide to move right on to the animatic, or have one individual create the final draft board from all the submissions.
3.) Discussed (briefly) the blog system, and had time for any questions. Nothing major came up to report back on. I think everyone has a pretty good grasp on it.
4.) The portal was discussed heavily. A majority of us feel the blog is actually the best place for an unregistered member to land, as it is the most informative and easy to look at. This means a couple of things; namely that we will need to make an effort to keep content on that blog to keep people coming back. Right now, the draw of the portal is that it is regularly changing, listing new posts, etc. For the blog to appear to have the same level of activity, it is important to keep new articles on progress appearing. I'd like to see 2 articles a week, and the weekly recap takes care of one of those anyway. The portal itself would remain, as many of us use it regularly, but would not be the first stop for new people.
5.) We discussed a lot of options for a very visible "Getting Started" section, from a static page to an interactive tutorial. The current idea is to have a guided walkthrough via a banner in the header that can be turned off when you longer need the site. This would mainly serve to guide people through the site, show them each of the pages, and give them an idea of where to find certain information when needed. I have started a thread with the first mockups here:
viewtopic.php?p=5887#p5887Finally, jut a couple of quick notes about the meetings in general. Meeting twice a month seems to be working wonders for productivity, and I think we ought to continue this regularly. One thing we did a little different this time worked; namely, in order to keep an all day meeting running (to get the most people), sometimes the meeting has to be led by different people. The bullet points for discussion will be posted before each meeting, so if one person has to leave, it is very easy for the next person to just take over and lead the Q/A for the next round of people. This is nice because no matter who you are, you don't want to be behind the computer ALL day long! So we'll see if running with that plan works well. All in all, it was a good meeting!
-CJ
(Obviously, I have opted to write a quick summary of conclusions, this does not cover word-for-word all the discussion that took place. If I have left anything out, please reply and I'll add it back in)